Your browser does not support script
TWV Presents...



Articles/Essays From Pagans

[Show all]


Views: 16,463,173


April 13th. 2014 ...

Don't Talk Yourself Out of Trying Something New!

Magick and Consequences: My Experience with Sigils

Being a Worrisome Witch

What to Do When the Spell/Ritual Flops


April 6th. 2014 ...

The Elements and the Quarters

Dark Moon Scry: Aries 2014

How the Wheel of the Year Works “Down Under”

13 Keys: The Understanding of Binah


March 30th. 2014 ...

Manifesting the Dream: On Religious Organizations, Pagan Abbeys and our Order

True Meaning of Community

Thoughts on Unverified Personal Gnosis

My Beautiful Grove- A Matter Of Perspective


March 23rd. 2014 ...

Spirituality and Social Change

The First Step to Anywhere!


March 16th. 2014 ...

From Christian to Pagan (Part I)

Nature And The Celtic Tree Calendar

The Teeth in the Darkness


March 9th. 2014 ...

Healing the Witch Within

Incarcerated Witches

Discovering Wicca as a Young Child

March Pisces Energy: Pre-natal Memories and Standing Upright


March 2nd. 2014 ...

Lessons of Ostara: Six Ways to Move Forward

The Wiccan Priest - The Misunderstood Role

Which is Which? Am I a Warlock or a Witch?

The Secret Teaching: Selected Aspects


February 23rd. 2014 ...

Wicca or Traditional Witchcraft: Some Differences

Everything is Not Under Your Control: Making Sense of the Senseless

The Wonders and Gifts of Paganism and Community

What Makes Us What We Are


February 16th. 2014 ...

The Stones of Fear: Anxiety Relief

Death, Grief, and Psychopomp Work in Shamanic Healing

Spiritual Traveler: Form To Essence

Alternative Medicine – What Is It?


February 9th. 2014 ...

Words of Power!

The Allure of Glamour in the Apocolypse

Lunar Insight Planetary Preponderances: Year of the Horse, Imbolc and Mercury Grazings


February 2nd. 2014 ...

The Magick of Jewelry and Metals

Building a Magick Mirror

The Golden Bough: a Study Guide (Part 2)


January 26th. 2014 ...

Love of Self: The Hardest Thing To Do

The Golden Bough as a Seminal Work in the Neo Pagan Movement (Part 1)

13 Keys: The Mercy of Chesed

Lightworking In The Screen Age: Staying Connected


January 19th. 2014 ...

Open Letter to the Goddess

A Southern Girl's Guide to Hospitality

Social Conventions and the Pagan World

Reclaiming Independence


January 12th. 2014 ...

Never Once Was There a An Athame Near My Chalice: My Very Sheltered Occultist Upbringing

One Wiccan's Journey Through Depression


January 5th. 2014 ...

Religion vs Practice: Defining Witchcraft in a Modern Age

Traditional Apprenticeships: Training in the Modern Pagan Abbey

2014's Magickal Magnificent Manifestations!

Lunar Insight Moon Musings, Planetary Preponderances: Wise and Wild


December 29th. 2013 ...

My Top Ten Favorite Cauldrons (Part 3)

13 Keys: The Might of Geburah

Beyond The Season of Greed


December 22nd. 2013 ...

My Top Ten Favorite Cauldrons (Part 2)


December 15th. 2013 ...

The Hex Murder of 1928

My Top Ten Favorite Cauldrons (Part 1)

Lady of the Forest Mist (A Story of the Woods)

Lunar Insight Moon Musings: Hunting, Fires and Parting Shots


December 8th. 2013 ...

Help and Thoughts for Pagans New to the Journey

Using Your Wand in Reverse

The Cry of the Soul

Leaving a Group - Part 2: Leaving, Healing and Moving Forward


December 1st. 2013 ...

The Tarot as a Tool for Raising Consciousness

A Pragmatic Look at Neo Paganism

Leaving a Pagan Group – Part 1: To Leave or to Stay?


November 24th. 2013 ...

The Groovy Aquarian Christ: Jesus From a Pagan Perspective

The Pagan and the Papacy


November 17th. 2013 ...

Which Witch? Philosophical and Psychological Roots of Wicca

For Love of the God

A Threat to Religious Liberties?


November 10th. 2013 ...

Where did Aleister Crowley’s Influence on Wicca Go?

Thoughts on the Threefold Law/Law of Return

The Celtic Tree Calendar

Nine Creeds: A Statement and Explanation of My Beliefs


November 3rd. 2013 ...

The Mundane/Spiritual Mirror: What Does it Say About Your Life?


October 27th. 2013 ...

Thoughts On a Miley-Cyrus/ Robin-Thicke Society

Pagan Religious Communities in your Area: Connecting With and Creating Them


NOTE: For a complete list of articles related to this chapter... Visit the Main Index FOR this section.












Article Specs

Article ID: 14839

VoxAcct: 379710

Section: words

Age Group: Adult

Days Up: 878

Times Read: 4,746

RSS Views: 16,559
Coming Out as a Zimmelblob

Author: Fire Lyte
Posted: November 20th. 2011
Times Viewed: 4,746

I was walking around a shopping center the other day when a man in a funny hat came up to me and exclaimed, “You are a GORGEOUS Zimmelblob!” Well, all I heard initially was ‘you are gorgeous’, so I said, “Thank you.” Then, as I was walking away, I turned back around to the man in the funny hat and asked, “What’s a Zimmelblob?” The man regarded me with a pitiful look, as if I’d asked him what a belly button is used for and said, “I think everyone knows what a Zimmelblob is. Zimmelblobs do not walk on four legs, they do not eat rocks, and they do not sleep in mailboxes.”

I stood there, staring at the man in utter confusion. “But…that could be anyone. In fact, that could describe a kangaroo, a lobster, or a DVD of Betty White’s greatest hits.” The man just shook his head and said, “That’s just silly. Of course a lobster isn’t a Zimmelblob. None of those are Zimmelblobs!”

This conversation went back and forth for a good 20 minutes with me posing other examples of potential Zimmelblobs and the man in the funny hat just shooting them down. And every time I was shot down, I asked the man to clarify what a Zimmelblob actually was. “I’d like to know what a Zimmelblob is, ” I told him “since, apparently, I am one.” I continued to get the response that it’s a non-four-legged thing that eschews the practice of eating rocks and doesn’t make its bed in a mailbox.

Later on in the evening, I beat my head against a wall. It was a lot better than trying to hash out what a Zimmelblob actually is.

Words are supposed to mean something. I don’t mean that in some grand philosophical way in which terms are applied to great acts of change or some ethereal discussion of the function of language. I mean everyday, practical, dirty, back-and-forth dialogue. The words we use should have a definition. Why? Because, if they didn’t, humans could not effectively communicate with one another. (And, no, this is not the time to make the argument that, no matter how good the definition, humans may never communicate effectively with one another.)

Though you may immediately have gotten where I’m going with this, I’d like to turn our collective attention to the word ‘pagan.’ More specifically, I’d like to turn our collective attention to the definition of the word ‘pagan.’

If you ask a pagan to define the word ‘pagan, ’ you’ll most likely come across one of these answers:

1) A pejorative that used to mean country dweller and was akin to the word ‘hick’ used to describe folks that lived in the country and practiced the Old Ways, while the folks that lived in the city practiced the New Religion of Christianity.
2) A member of a polytheistic religion.
3) Some long-winded diatribe about how nobody really knows what a pagan is and that it means different things to different people, and - oh by the way - would you like a slice of patchouli granola pie? I picked it fresh this morning.
4) A member of any non-Abrahamic religion.

Sure. Ok. Fine. These definitions are all practical definitions, and they’re all practically crap. Yes. You read that right. Each of these 4 definitions is total bologna. Why? Because, still, none of these four definitions is telling me what a pagan is. It’s either giving me what it’s not, or giving me a vague notion of what it might be.

Don’t believe me? Ok. I’ll show you.

1) The first definition of “used to mean country dweller” does not tell me what a pagan is in the current sense of the word. A definition must be current, as a definition changes over time with the usage and context of the day.
2) The second definition is so vague that it doesn’t tell me anything. The ancient Hebrews were polytheistic. It can be argued that the Christian trinity is an example of polytheism. Hindus, Heathens, and nearly any faith out there can be linked back to a belief in multiple gods. And, I’m sure that you’re not going to find many Christians out there that would say they were pagan.
3) This one is a weak non-definition. It’s a cheap cop out born from a desire not to step on anyone’s toes. It doesn’t tell anybody anything.
4) This is what most people - pagans included - use as a definition for pagan. For many years it was the dictionary’s definition. (Though, Merriam-Webster has since updated their definition to #2 on this list and no longer uses this as the official definition.) It, too, shares many problems with definition #2. I do not believe that a Jainist would say they are pagan, nor would a Taoist, a Rastafarian, or a Zen Buddhist Monk. There are dozens of other faiths in the world that have nothing to do with Abraham (not that he’s not a nice guy and all) , and many, if not all, of them would never say they were pagan.

So, what do we do? We have to have a word.

I know. I’m going to get emails telling me how awful I am, that I’m buying in to the mainstream idea of labeling and defining the indefinable. If that is your thought, I suggest you open that mind up a little bit more and shed some light on the cobwebs. (You may spend the next 12-second dusting them off quickly.) Humans communicate with language. I tell you to pass the potatoes, and you know that doesn’t mean to jump on the table and beat your chest like Tarzan. The understood ‘you’, the words ‘pass’ and ‘potatoes’ all give an indication of what I am hoping to happen.

The Lexical Definition of something is a fancy word for the Dictionary Definition. It is the meaning of the term in common usage. The dictionary definition can, and often does, change with time - as was stated earlier - given the usage by users of the word over time. Lexical definitions are meant to be descriptive. That is, they are supposed to tell you what something is. They are also supposed to be short, to the point, and leave no question as to what one means.

Saying that a pagan is anyone who is a member of a non-Abrahamic religion or a member of a polytheistic religion might begin to lead us in the right direction, but that is like telling someone who asks you how to get to China to ‘go east.’ You might eventually get there, but you might just as easily get stuck in Africa, Russia, Spain, or the next town over. How far is China? Is it due east, or is it perhaps southeast or northeast? Are there longitudinal and latitudinal coordinates that might help? What method of transportation would most efficiently get me to China? Defining the word ‘pagan’ as anyone who isn’t a member of an Abrahamic religion, or is a polytheist, or not choosing to define it at all, is like telling someone that China is a country in the east. It is imprecise, and, thus, is a useless definition in a practical sense.

Luckily, dictionaries and people have a tool available to them called a 'precising definition'. This is used when someone believes the definition of something is too vague to be useful. In Critical Thinking: A Student’s Introduction (Bassham, et al. 2002) , the example is of a movie theater that sells discounted tickets to students. Unfortunately, many people can qualify as students… the 47-year-old taking a night class, the loud-mouthed frat guy. So, the theater uses a precising definition to further qualify that they mean ‘anyone under the age of 18 that is enrolled at a local school.’ Now, we could get into the semantics of what they mean by the word ‘local, ’ but let’s not be petty. If you’re in the area, under 18, and have your student ID, you probably qualify.

One could say that a student is a member of the non-working class, but there are students who work, and it also does not define the age of the person in question. One could say that a student is a pupil, and a pupil is an Old French term for an orphan child or ward. It tells us what it might have been used for in the past, but it doesn’t tell us anything about its use today. See the problem? We have to say what a student is today, right now.

You might say, “But, Fire Lyte, there are so many different people with so many different definitions for ‘pagan.’ It would be wrong or unfair to define the term.” A definition, inherently, excludes everything that the word is not. If I ask you to pass me the fork, you know I mean to leave the spoon and knife alone and pass me only the utensil with the tines used for piercing and eating food. Yes, it excludes the spoon, but the spoon shouldn’t feel bad. It is a spoon. It has its own definition and entry in the dictionary. There is a place for the spoon, but to define the fork, one must exclude the spoon.

Poor spoon.

Some might say, “But, Fire Lyte, we’re such a small group! How could we possibly come together to define our term?" The best estimates we have say that there are about 1-2 million pagans in the world today. There are quite a few other religions in the world that only have that many, or less, adherents, and somehow there are functional definitions for those groups. Want to know what a Rastafarian is? (A group with around 700, 000 members worldwide) Rastafarianism is “a religious movement among black Jamaicans that teaches the eventual redemption of blacks and their return to Africa, employs the ritualistic use of marijuana, forbids the cutting of hair, and venerates Haile Selassie as a god.” (M-W Online) See! Small groups can be defined.

I can hear the argument, “Hey, Fire Lyte! We have a word for a modern pagan. It’s ‘neo-pagan.’” Yeah. Ok. I hear you. And, that might work as a functional word and definition for modern day pagans, except for one problem: the lexical definition for ‘neo-pagan’ is ‘a person who practices a contemporary form of paganism.’ So, we’re right back where we started. Defining a term by another term sometimes works, but only in cases in which that second term is concretely defined and not still milling around in the abstract.

There’s also another problem with using an imprecise definition. We tend to apply it to people or groups whether they ascribe to the common usage of the word or not. I see pagans all the time lumping Hinduism and Shinto and a host of other faiths in with modern paganism. But I don’t ever see Hindus saying that Hinduism is a pagan religion. Hinduism has its own definition. It is the spoon in comparison with the fork. It is an inflicting and imposing of a definition on a person or group that does not fit the common vernacular. Again, to go back to a point I made earlier. We can use the current lexical definition of ‘a polytheist’ to define the term ‘pagan, ’ but I think many of us can agree that is an altogether vague and far too inclusive of an idea.

Perhaps our problem is that we don’t know. We simply are too young, too widespread, or too caught up in being paganer-than-thou to come up with a functional definition. Do you know how Merriam-Webster defines words? They’ll tell you plain as day on their website. It’s usage. They look at a cross-section of reading material and attempt to use the context surrounding the word to derive a current, functional definition. My question is, why is it that we can have a precise, functional, lexical definition for terms like Rastafarianism or Bahai or Unitarian Universalism - or, hell, even Zoroastrianism - but we get a one-line, obtuse definition for the word ‘pagan’?

The answer seems to be that we don’t know. We simply do not know what a ‘pagan’ is in modern context. That’s why many people use the word ‘Wicca’ or ‘Wiccan.’ It’s well-known, and the lexical definition is more or less precise. Though, one might argue that the dictionary is defining ‘neo-pagan’ rather than Wiccan. Merriam-Webster currently defines Wicca as “a religion influenced by pre-Christian beliefs and practices of western Europe that affirms the existence of supernatural power (as magic) and of both male and female deities who inhere in nature and that emphasizes ritual observance of seasonal and life cycles.”

Some people, however, don’t like the term ‘Wiccan.’ Either they have a thing against Gerald Gardner, or they don’t like rules, or they can’t seem to figure out which denomination of Wicca to belong to. The term ‘pagan’ seems to be used for those in the milieu of nature-based beliefs, that have a belief in - and possibly practice - magic, and acknowledge the existence of multiple deities, though they may worship only a select one or few. Paganism might also include a reverence for ancient deities and/or otherwise dead religions, reconstructing and modernizing them. It can be a host of things, but our problem is that we cannot stop fighting over who is and who isn’t to decide what they are or aren’t.

I am not here to propose a definition. But, I am proposing that it might be time we define ourselves. A functional definition allows those who meet us to look us up and know what we are. It defines the term in such a way that we can have discussions of faith without first spending 4 hours arguing back and forth in order to set usable definitions for terms like ‘pagan’ or ‘witch’ so that we can have that discussion of faith. It’s one less weight on our collective shoulders and one less source of in-fighting, which does nothing to advance our cause in the greater community. A functional definition would allow us to confidently self-identify, especially when something like a census or legal matter comes up in which things like religious identity matter. It could be a beacon, a spot where we can all gather around and be a community.

We can be forks, and not question whether or not we’re spoons! We can know what in the world a Zimmelblob actually is, so we know whether to be offended when someone calls us a gorgeous one.

We can stand, staring at the guy in the funny hat all day long, arguing over what a Zimmelblob might and might not be. Or, we can work to define it, peacefully and with a sense of unity. Until then, I will wear my Zimmelblob badge proudly, confident in the idea that it’s a good thing. Make that pretty confident. OK... 25% confident. Ok, he called me gorgeous. What do you want from me? I’m only human.





Footnotes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition
http://www.M-W.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictionary_definition
Bassham, Gregory; Irwin, William; Nardone, Henry; Wallace, James M. (2002) . Critical Thinking: A Student's Introduction. New York: McGraw Hill.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_religions#Largest_religions_or_belief_systems_by_number_of_adherents


Copyright: (c) Fire Lyte - 2011 - Inciting A Riot



ABOUT...

Fire Lyte


Location: Chicago, Illinois

Website: http://www.IncitingARiot.com

Author's Profile: To learn more about Fire Lyte - Click HERE




Other Articles: Fire Lyte has posted 32 additional articles- View them?

Other Listings: To view ALL of my listings: Click HERE




Email Fire Lyte... (No, I have NOT opted to receive Pagan Invites! Please do NOT send me anonymous invites to groups, sales and events.)

To send a private message to Fire Lyte ...



Pagan Essays
1996-2014





Pagan Web
8,000 Links





Pagan Groups
Local Covens etc.





Pagan/Witch
80,000 Profiles














Home - TWV Logos - Email US - Privacy
News and Information

Chapters: Pagan/Heathen Basics - Pagan BOOKS - Traditions, Paths & Religions - Popular Pagan Holidays - TV & Movies - Cats of the Craft - Festival Reviews - Festival Tips - White Pages (Resources) - Issues/Concerns - West Memphis 3 - Witch Hunts - Pagan Protection Tips - Healing Planet Earth

Your Voices: Adult Essays - Young Pagan Essays - Pagan Perspectives (On Hold) - WitchWars: Fire in the Craft - Gay Pagan - Pagan Parenting - Military - Pagan Passages

Pagan Music: Pagan Musicians - Bardic Circle at WitchVox - Free Music from TWV

Vox Central: About TWV - Wren: Words, Wrants and Wramblings - Guest Rants - Past Surveys - A Quest for Unity

Weekly Updates: Click HERE for an index of our weekly updates for the past 6 years

W.O.T.W. - World-Wide Networking

Your Town: A Link to YOUR Area Page (The largest listing of Witches, Pagans, Heathens and Wiccans on the Planet)

VoxLinks: The Pagan Web: 8,000 Listings

Your Witchvox Account: Log in Now - Create New Account - Request New Password - Log in Problems

Personal Listings: Pagan Clergy in Your Town - Adult Pagans - Young Pagans - Military Pagans

Events: Circles, Gatherings, Workshops & Festivals

Covens/Groups/Orgs: Local Groups Main Page

Other LOCAL Resources: Local Shops - Regional Sites - Local Notices - Global/National Notices - Local Skills & Services - Local Egroups - Political Freedom Fighters

Pagan Shopping: Online Shops Index - Original Crafters Sites - Auction Sites - Pagan Wholesalers - Pagan Local Shops



Web Site Content (including: text - graphics - html - look & feel)
Copyright 1997-2014 The Witches' Voice Inc. All rights reserved
Note: Authors & Artists retain the copyright for their work(s) on this website.
Unauthorized reproduction without prior permission is a violation of copyright laws.

Website structure, evolution and php coding by Fritz Jung on a Macintosh G5.

Any and all personal political opinions expressed in the public listing sections (including, but not restricted to, personals, events, groups, shops, Wren’s Nest, etc.) are solely those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinion of The Witches’ Voice, Inc. TWV is a nonprofit, nonpartisan educational organization.

Sponsorship: Visit the Witches' Voice Sponsor Page for info on how you
can help support this Community Resource. Donations ARE Tax Deductible.
The Witches' Voice carries a 501(c)(3) certificate and a Federal Tax ID.

Mail Us: The Witches' Voice Inc., P.O. Box 341018, Tampa, Florida 33694-1018 U.S.A.
Witches, Pagans
of The World




Search Articles
1996-2014










 Current Topic
 Editorial Guide


NOTE: The essay on this page contains the writings and opinions of the listed author(s) and is not necessarily shared or endorsed by the Witches' Voice inc.

The Witches' Voice does not verify or attest to the historical accuracy contained in the content of this essay.

All WitchVox essays contain a valid email address, feel free to send your comments, thoughts or concerns directly to the listed author(s).